You know what I notice when I watch internet reviews? Most of the ones out there are by more…liberal minded youths.
Youths being subjective, some of them are in their thirties.
But they more to the left, if you know what I mean.
I still enjoy their reviews and get something from them, but on certain issues, they always end up disappointing me by taking the opposite stance from what I would.
A common example would be racism in films (by the way it’s a lot easier to see racism in films than in books.)
A lot of the time it’s just pointed out to make a sarcastic joke, and the observation is not based on substantial evidence that the movie was being racist.
Like in old Disney movies.
Maybe, and I say it with reluctance, Walt Disney did have some racist leanings. A lot of people did in the forties and fifties, even those who wouldn’t have identified themselves as for segregation.
But I might point out his movies were probably one of the first, if not the first, to feature ethnic characters in a kid’s film.
Also, I question whether all stereotyping is harmful.
To a kid, the stereotyping is a lot less about color or speech and a lot more about how the character acts. They won’t recognize singing a certain way as a stereotype. They’ll be paying more attention to whether the character is being good or bad.
And that’s why black is associated with evil and white is associated with good.
Before you get all offended (if you’re the type who does.) Let me further explain.
The black vs white thing has nothing to do with race, as much as certain groups of people would like you to believe it does. It’s all about the contrast between darkness and light.
This goes way back to the Bible itself, along with plenty of mythologies around the world. Darkness, night, underground, etc, is always representative of evil.
Which is not a coincidence or a chance but a deep truth. In darkness you are blind and you lose your way. That’s how you become evil. In a nutshell.
But light, daytime, open air, they all represent truth and goodness.
And we all know the connection there. Freedom and seeing things clearly leads to happiness and goodness.
Plus most people are afraid of the dark as children and prefer the daylight hours.
That villains are traditionally clothed in black or other dark colors is not a racist thing, nor are references to things looking blacker than before. Context, people, context.
Black characters are not often cast as villains anyway.
Which is also called racist, but I think the white people ought to be more offended over this.
why are we always portrayed as evil maniacs who lie, kill, steal, as if it were nothing?
And if this doesn’t bother you, but black characters not being villains does, you have a problem.
Because that’s basically saying white people can be evil and it’s normal, but black people can be evil and it’s special. It makes them important.
How messed up is that idea on so many levels?
Furthermore, if old movies portrayed black and Asian characters as goofy, quirky, and stereotypical, were they any better to white characters?
Couldn’t the whole tea party thing from Alice in Wonderland be called an English stereotype? Could the white rabbit who’s always in a hurry and kind of a milksop be a stereotype?
Actually all the characters int eh movie are white and very quirky.
But if that’s not the best example, what aobut the princess movies?
The only non white princesses are also ones portrayed as more proactive and hardworking and anti damsel in distress. (Pocahontas, Tiana, and Jasmine.) You can argue all day about how their ethnicity as a whole is portrayed, but aren’t they less helpless and docile than Cinderella and Snow White and Aurora; all European.
And aren’t all the white princesses up till Merida stereotypically man–oriented without any power of their own?
Merida and Elsa are still the only real exceptions to this so far.
Am I saying we should come down on Disney for all this? NO.
I don’t care.
I really don’t need movie characters to tell me what my gender should do or be. I don’t see little boys walking around being princely. (Too bad.) If I like identifying with princesses, it’s because something in the idea of it itself appeals to me. Not because i think that’s the embodiment of what a woman should be.
I would find that thought ridiculous.
And I don’t ask movies to define femininity for me. Wonder Woman is just as feminine to me as Cinderella. Because woman are different, and what we share is hard to capture in one film.
Saying that Cinderella or Wonder Woman are the peak of womanliness is as silly as trying to pick between a t\super smart guy or the tough wrestler guy as the epitome of manliness.
Doesn’t a man need both brains and brawn? Don’t most men fall between those two extremes. Or in some cases, are both. (Hi Batman….and most Superhero men.)
And don’t most women have both a tough and bold side, and a demure and beauty loving side.
For me those two sides are inseparable. I can be bold and appreciate the finer things in life simultaneously.
And any movie that says those are mutually exclusive is idiotic.
Just like any movie that thinks it can accurate portray an entire ethnicity is idiotic.
Here’s the rub.
People are all different. A movie portraying an ethnicity can only portray the most well known parts of it, or the worst parts, or the funniest parts, to get so many people to follow along.
It’s not a movie’s place to define a race. Only to use race as a storytelling tool.
It can’t tell you what you are, and how you live. It’s not able to do that. And no one should ask it too.
That’s not to excuse any film that’s using stereotypes just to put people down and dump on one culture or another. Those films are garbage.
But most films are just trying to tell the story using what the majority is familiar with. And that’s true whether it’s an american film portraying English stereotypes, or a Bollywood film portraying American stereotypes. (It happens.)
Whatever. Can I just focus on the actual message?
Those are my thoughts anyway, until next time–Natasha.