… But if you close your eyes Does it almost feel like nothing changed at all? And if you close your eyes Does it almost feel like you’ve been here before? How am I gonna be an optimist about this? How am I gonna be an optimist about this?
We were caught up and lost in all of our vices In your pose as the dust settled around us
The rough draft of this post got erased somehow…I guess I shouldn’t leave things on this site…
So starting over from scratch, what would be a good thing to write about?
I know that my original point was how well this song describes us now. I mean us in the Western World.
You know it’s funny how much depression runs rampant in our cultures, considering we have more benefits than we ever have.
But that’s actually something we have in common with animals.
A study was done on rats, where they were given everything they needed, all the time, never had to work for it.
The rats developed depression, as well as other unhealthy habits, for rats…and for humans.
But you might see the same thing with dogs. They’re bred for work, and when they’re kept as pets but not exercised properly or given any tasks to do, they will also get depressed.
And so do humans.
This life of staring at screens and working from home, and not getting outside and having to really work to solve problems that many of us have is making us depressed. We feel like we have no meaning, because there is no effort.
We don’t have to be fighting for survival, to feel accomplished, any creative goal can help, but most especially if it’s necessary.
I know each generation has its issues with how the younger one has it easier and isn’t disciplined.
I do think there’s some truth in that, though. Even I feel less invested in homework assignments since I had to do them digitally, and it’s just a little too easy now. I know it doesn’t prove I’m smart now, if I succeed, it just proves I knew what the teacher wanted. Many times I could have done way more if left to my own devices.
But the education system encourages me not to be creative, because my grade will suffer if I don’t meet the exact requirements of the assignment. Ever get in trouble for going over the page limit? Yeah…
But anyway, my point is, we don’t have to really work. There are people who do, but the ones who are the face and voice of our culture don’t.
And that is every race, gender, and whatever else.
i think that’s part of the reason we spend so much time fighting each other, really. While history shows people would fight each other no matter what, it doesn’t help that we really have all the time in the world to do it now, instead of having to set aside time to go to war.
All this has got me to thinking.
About how few people under 30 even know history now, they really don’t know that much period. Not science, or religion, or how people work.
You have your outliers, like my cousin, who like to do their own research, but they’re not the majority.
Not that this is unusual, in pampered societies, it’s pretty normal, actually…and then they crumble.
That’s what the song Pompeii is about, really. How when we’re left to ourselves, to follow our own whims, we get buried in our sins, until disaster strikes, and freezes us that way forever.
And how can you be an optimist about this? When there is only one outcome ever to societies in moral decay like that.
“In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.” (Judges 21:25, 17:6)
Both those instance talk about someone doing something pretty stupid and wrong. And also it says:
“Be not wise in your own eyes: fear the LORD, and depart from evil.” (Proverbs 3:7)
We are wise in our own eyes now aren’t we?
Like all this prattle about not getting married and staying single that I wrote about before. What is that but being wise in our own eyes.
And we don’t seem to care what generations of humans before us said or thought. We’ve got it figued out now.
I mean because with zero experience, zero study, and only the corrupt examples of current culture to go by, clearly we’re well informed on these issues.
But the depression of this age has gone so far now, that a lot of kids don’t even care anymore if they’re right.
Case in point, just yesterday, I was in YT comment thread with someone who said that truth doesn’t matter tot ehm.
I was asking them why they bothered to watch the whole video of a debate if they didn’t care about the truth or what was right.
I got no answer to that so far. I probably never will.
At this point, admitting you hunger for a definitive truth is like a weakness to our relativistic young people–and some older people also.
Of course the dismissive attitude of older people isn’t helping.
I mean, who let the kids watch PBS and Disney Channel and Cartoon network? I noticed the bad messages of those channels when I was a kid. I’m not surprised the people who never questioned it have now swallowed it hook line and sinker.
I mean, you take a whole show like Dora the Explorer, and you go on a quest through a fake map, looking fora fake item, learn a few Spanish words…and you call that exploring?
Nothing against Dora personally, it’s an okay show for entertainment–but it’s not really educational. And it’s not even the worst one.
It’s hard to blame the young, they’re just doing what they were taught to do, and by the time they realize it wasn’t right, they’ll have a lot of regrets.
Still we have our own responsibility. And they do choose not to think, not to try, not to explore for real. And that’s on them.
I bring all this up, but do I have a solution?
I think the solution is the same as it’s always been.
Person by person, the only thing to do is try to get people to understand the condition they’er in.
Debate isn’t always the best way to do that, I admit. Though it works for some.
I’ve had most people just duck out of arguments when they realized I was going to win because I was better informed than them, or just straight up insult me.
But people can’t always be so quick to dismiss if you touch them on a personal level.
We need both.
But it’s hard, there’s so few people fighting these battles compared to the people who are casualties in them.
But that’s how it usually goes. We preserve a remnant of the people. The majority of them don’t want to be helped.
Some will literally say so, I have grandparents who would say that.
We love our sin so much.
We love being able to do what we wnat.
And now it’s not a secret, you’d even hear it hailed from the streets and the theaters and political campaigns that we’d rather die doing what we’d prefer to do, right or wrong, then live submitting to God’s will.
I saw this comment today, it was like this: I don’t believe in God because there’s nothing about same sex relationship in the bible and He’s not okay with them.
First: There’s actually plenty about homosexuality in the Bible, Sodom and Gomorrah, the books of the Law, and Romans 1 all talk about it. (It’s called Sodomy in the old Testament)
Second: I find that these types of objections completely misunderstand the nature of God’s existence.
You see, if God exists does not depend on our personal preferences. He either does, or He doesn’t.
If He does exist, He is the final say on what is right and wrong. You, as His creation, don’t get an opinion.
Sure, against other humans, you do. But not against God. If God was in front of you and He told you, that would be the last word. And if you saw God, in His Glory, the last thing you would dream of doing is arguing with Him.
See, the point of contention is not if God supports what we feel is right.
If God is the Reality, then that is the reality we have to deal with. Even if He was the bloodthirsty God of many religions, cruel and spiteful, which would be bad for us. But it would be Reality, there’d be nothing we can do about it.
Thankfully, God is not like that. But He’s still unchangeable. Your preferences donesn’t come into it.
You may not like it….and God has never said we have to like doing what He says…but He does say we need to do it.
As a Christian, I do find that the rewards of serving God is that if you do it long enough, you will start to like it, and then eventually, you won’t be able to do without it. But that’s sort of an insider bonus. The bible promises that one day everyone will have to submit to God’s will, whether they like it or not.
It’s a bit like Gravity. Many of us wish we could fly, and though we can sort of, using machines, we have to borrow that from things God made that can defy gravity, we ourselves can’t defy gravity more than a few feet in the air before it yanks us back down.
In the same way, we can’t defy God’s design for very far in our moral lives. Maybe if we had the “help” from the devil, we can go farther…gross.
But that’s short lived, and on our own, the consequences of our actions will always pull us back down to the ground eventually.
Christians believe that one day God will set us free form the law of Gravity, just as one day, we don’t need the Law of morality anymore…because we’ll become things that don’t need gravity, and things that don’t need law. We’ll have a new nature.
Like a caterpillar turns into a butterfly.
But until then, this is what we’ve got. We have to work with it.
I’m not an optimist about Mans’ ability to fix this world. I think we’re as doomed as Pompeii.
But I always knew that.
But I still have hope. I hope in God’s ability to always save some people, as He promises to do. And in that hope, we keep trying to be a part of that.
I haven’t made my list yet, not sure what I want to happen this year.
But my church always does a 21 day fast at the start of the year.
I don’t really fast food, I think I might be hypoglycemic, not eating makes me feel really sick, really fast, and no sugar will have a weird effect on me too.
I’ve tried food fasting in the past and never got beyond 1 day at most, and that was torture.
Sometimes I fast a particular food instead.
But after my scare last year of dropping 15 lbs, and thankfully, gaining them all back, I have decided to just be happy to eat normally.
So, I tend to fast things like movies, TV shows, or writing too much.
Fasting could really just be called abstaining since it’s not always about food and water.
While it’s gotten a bad rap thanks to the rise of bulimia and Eating Disorders, fasting isn’t unhealthy when it’s done in the right proportions. It cleanses your system, uses up excess sugars, and for most people, won’t make you feel all that bad. (I’m an unfortunate exception.)
While fasting is not commanded per sec to Christians, Jesus said that his followers would fast when he was no longer with them. Which would be now.
Not every godly character in the Bible fasted, but many prophets, kings and judges did.
While I have no fasted food that often, I have learned somethig just from what I do fast.
And I thought it might be worht writing about.
I’ve alwas been terrible at the prayer and worship part of fasting. I’m told that’s why I haven’t had better success with it.
I used to try it and felt no different, so I didn’t bother.
I’m one of those people who doesn’t like to be demanded to do things. So my relationship with Spiritual Discipline has always been tempestuous. Either I got carried way denying myself because it was so counter-intuitive, or I didn’t do it at all.
I still struggle with that.
Spiritual Discipline has been neglected a lot in the Western Church. My church does practice it and encourage a handful of them, but there’s a bunch we don’t really address either.
I hear Catholics do some, but most Catholics I’ve met weren’t serious enough about the faith for me to ask them about it.
I know that one discipline is silence and another is solitude. That’s hard now. We almost never have to be alone with our thoughts.
Actually that’s where I found fasting things like TV and movies to be helpful.
I have images and sounds playing through my memory all day, every day.
I had that before I had TV, honestly. The same things used to happen with books. We have to have something to fill up our thoughts.
Better that then anxiety. I suffered from anxiety so much in the past, even as a kid, I used to use books to escape, then I used TV. Now I use writing as well.
None of those things are bad, but you get to rely on them too much. They aren’t perfect substitutes for God. But they do distract you.
When you give that up, even for three days, the difference is immense.
24 hours without TV and I feel like a different person usually. A whole week, and it’s like I’m more clear.
Already, in the last three days, I’ve been bored, listless, and blue ( not fasting TV, but I don’t think yo all need to know what I’m giving up. It’s a private matter, I’m just using TV as an easy example.)
I fill up my days so much with this thing, I don’t know what to do without it. I push aside prayer, worship, and even physical exercise because I do it so much.
It’s too much and I know that, but I don’t want to stop.
Fasting can be like a self chosen intervention.
It’s never easy, but because I have been doing it for years, I do escape the lie many people believe, which is that it’s not possible.
I learned at a young age to use self control because of fasting. Not perfectly, but at a level most kids don’t reach. Most adults don’t either. How many of us really try to control ourselves from giving into urges.
Heck, they tell us that’s unhealthy now.
It’s really not. Most doctors would probably tell you you should not give in to every urge you have all the time. Especially if you’re an addict.
I was watching a YT video last week “Why you’ll marry the wrong person” and this man was saying that we’re all addicts to something, whatever we use to keep from being alone with ourselves.
I felt a little called out, to be honest.
I used to be okay with being alone with myself, but it got to where I had anxiety every time I was alone with my thoughts.
But then again, that could be just a result of overstimulating myself so much to begin with.
Our brains get addicted to screens, and if we get off them for a brief time, we can feel withdrawal. We’re not necessarily depressed, so much as we’re empty.
You can tell because the depresison goe waway while you’re on the screen, but ocmes back once you’ve been off for five minutes. That’s addiction.
Some addiction to screens is inevitable for us, like some dependence on sugar is.
But there is a way to cut down on your absolute dependence it, and for that, fasting is ideal.
Also turn on the blue light filter on your screen if you have one, that helps, the blue light is addictive and stressfull.
I used to be very judgmental of people who were on their phones all the time, till I got a smartphone. Then I understood.
I don’t play games on mine, in an effort to stay on it less. But I do edit, and read web comics on it. I do use it to play music. And I’m not even as bad as I used to be.
Cutting back on it is hard. And if I’m not on my phone, I’m on my laptop, like I am right now.
I still read real books, though, and it’s amazinghow revitalized your brain feels after a few chapters if you stick it out.
Since I started this fast, I’m both more tired at night, and more ready to go to bed on time. Less stimulation to keep me up. My sisters too. We’ve gone to bed at 1 AM for months, but since I started this, we’ve been going to bed by 12 am or even before 11 pm. Go figure.
I’m not anti-screen. I do like moives, and I like being able to write faster and edit faster on a screen. It’s a nice thing.
But I am against being mastered by anything, as Paul or Peter wrote in the bible. All things are lawful for us, but not all things are helpful.
My family has always been against a lot of technology in our lives, my mom didn’t all of us to have a TV. And she was against having a computer that played movies for years.
I can see why, my Dad got addicted to it as soon as we got it, and to video games.
I almost ended up that way too.
But when I was 13-14, I started fasting. Actually I think I started at 12.
I didn’t know what I was doing at the time, and some stuff makes me cringe now, but the effort was there. And when I did that, I learned to control myself and my urges to play on that computer.
Also seeing my dad’s addictive behavior scared the crap out of me.
Years later, it’s still a temptation, but it’s not as big of one. I can abstain if I want to. It’s good to refresh that every once in a while.
I worked it out.
I think God put me on the path just for that reason.
And while my mental health is not always as good as I wish, it’s much better than most of the people I know, and they don’t all have that practice. My critical thinking ability is also far better, as is my reading comprehension.
I don’t believe this would be so rare, if we had more limits to our screen time. The kids I know whose parents limit their screen intake a lot are much smarter and usually better behaved. I know my sisters and I were better behaved for our babysitters as kids.
It is what it is.
Fasting taught me to set rules for myself even if my parents no longer did it for me. I think my mom taught me restraint, having limits to desserts, TV, and game time. And in turn I learned to employ it on myself.
With lots of prayer also.
It’s now been almost 2 weeks of my fast, (this post is late because I got sick), and so far, it’s not yielded miraculous results.
But you know, I don’t really think it needs to. I used to think that fasting would always be like the big ones in the Bible. Spiritual awakening, breakthrough, seeing visions, or whatever.
It’s easy to forget that fasting was regularly practiced as a reminder to focus on God, and things that are more important than our physical comfort.
For me, sacrificing just one of the many distractions I fill up my time with, reminds me that I can live without that thing.
We have a very desperate culture now. People often “jokingly” say that they won’t kill themselves just so they can find out what happens next in their favorite anime, TV show, or web-series.
I knew MHA was becoming a little too important to me when the news that season 5 would be delayed made me feel suicidal for a second. I hadn’t realized how contagious that way of thinking is.
And we should call it what it is, idolatry. We’re worshiping these shows.
Some people aren’t even subtle about it, they call the creators their “lord and savior.”
Is it supposed to be a joke? Maybe.
Ever notice that some things can be a joke, but still totally serious also.
See, worship isn’t always about thinking something is worth devoting your life and purpose too.
The Bible mocks and reproaches people who bow to wood, and stone, and gold gods. Saying that they will use half a block of wood to burn, but the other half to make a god, and will bow to it.
God apparently finds this ridiculous. And so do we, on paper.
But we’ll devote endless hours of time to 2D characters and mediocre story writing, just because it’s our crap, you know…and we know it’s crap, or it’s not real, but we don’t care. How is that really different from burning half the material we made our god from?
You can use firewood and not worship it, and you can watch shows and not worship them–but, if you’re surrounding yourself with people who do, it’s so easy to become twisted by that. I know plenty of Christians who compromise their morals for shows.
And maybe I have t oo, much to my shame.
I’ve cut way back on my anime viewing, I think my craze is dying down. I still enjoy a few, like any other medium. I did the same with Webtoon. I read it like crazy at first, but inevitably, it didn’t satisfy me, and now I just read a few episodes on an average day, sometimes none at all. Take me maybe 10-20 minutes. That’s probably harmless.
I confess, I make the same mistakes as everyone else. I think that my need for emotional fulfillment can be met by fiction. Even in creating my own.
And what is an idol, but fiction? It’s a fictional god, isn’t it? Back before we had common forms of entertainment, worshiping an idol was a nice distraction…people used to worship idols by having sex, did you know that? Not too different from anime and it’s fan service, and husbands and waifus, now is it?
Except you can’t actually have sex with an anime character, so we’ve traded something that was at least partially real, for an even more twisted version of it.
I mean, having a crush on a fictional character is normal, but…the kind of stuff people do to fetish-ize it…that’s not normal (and I don’t crush on fictional characters as it is.)
What I’m saying is that, when you get caught up in this temptation to worship and go after other things, a fast may be the best way to recenter yourself.
Mine hasn’t changed my whole life, but it changes a small part of it. I have to think about God a little more, and remember that what I’m fasting was not enough for me anyway.
And while I may not feel high off of God’s spirit right now, and fasting doesn’t always make me feel closer to God, I have learned that it’s not necessarily the purpose of fasting to do that. It can, and I have seen a slight improvement from it…but fasting is to re-evaluate priorities, and realize your mistakes.
I realize, I have mistakenly made certain things too important in my life. I realize that I need to think more about how I spread God’s word, and His message.
I realize that the ways I do it, like through writing this blog, may not be how I wish I could (I love writing, but I love interacting with people in person also) but it is available to me.
I may never know if it really helped anyone or not, but I can put it out there, that’s all we can do.
I am reminded that whatever else changes in my life, God is my constant.
And, I am reminded that all the things of this world are temporary.
Time was that the thought of losing one of my distractions would give me a panic attack.
And I own’t say I wouldn’t be upset now, but now I do stop myself and think “But if that happens, I still have other interests, and God can still use me in other ways, and I’ll get through it. It won’t be the end of me.”
I realize I am unique in having this understanding, not because I am especially good or free of temptation, but because I made it a practice to go without things for years, and to learn that I could bear not having them. You can live without anything, just about.
And I guess that is what I learned from fasting, to sum it up.
I hope this was interesting or even helpful to you.
If you now feel like you may want to try fasting yourself, I am no authority on it, but I do suggest starting small. Try 1-3 days of fasting a food or item or hobby.
If you think you can, try a week or even two weeks of no TV or whatever your addiction is.
You can also set aside one day to not watch TV or be on your phone, I’ve done this, with pretty good results. Brain break, right?
Another thing to try is setting aside an hour or half an hour each day to just not be on your phone, and to have fewer distractions, quiet time.
If you can get up to a month or even more than that, that’s about the Bible’s usual limit, 40 days. Anything longer than that is more of a lifestyle change than a fast, but a fast is a great time to ask yourself if you do need to make this a permanent change in your life.
And don’t brag about fasting, Jesus warned us not to do that. Only tell people who will need to know just so they know not to tempt you. Like I may refrain form making cookies while my sister or mom is fasting sugar, or I may not talk about shows or YouTube vids if they are fasting that. It’s different for everyone.
If you can, fast with your family, makes it easier to stick to it.
Remember also, something doesn’t have to be a bad thing if you fast it, it just has to be a problem for you. Don’t preach at other people that they shouldn’t partake of the thing you’re fasting from, unless they are rubbing it in your face, it’s really none of your business what they do.
Other than that, the rules are up to you and God. I’m just laying out the groundwork for how the Bible says to treat fasting. Not to be depressed about it.
Really, God would rather us not fast at all it would seem if we can’t do it with a good attitude. Repenting during a fast is okay, normal and expected. But whining about it is just annoying.
(And I need to watch myself for that too, I’m realizing. Wry comments can so easily become complaints.)
With that, I think I’ll leave you to decide, until next time, stay honest–Natasha.
I was going to post sooner and I got sidetracked by getting the new Covid variant.
Frist time I got one, and I get the one with mild cold symptoms, go figure.
I felt worse honestly for not eating a few days afterward than I did while I had a fever, the fatigue and aches were the worst of it.
But I’m recovered now.
Anyway, to fill up my time while I’m fasting certain things, and taking a break from anime, my sisters and I have been binging the old X-Men animated show.
If you’ve never seen it, you should watch it, it’s really good. It’s on Amazon Prime.
It was a different time, man.
It’s not a perfect show, but it’s so much better than the movies. And the dialogue is refreshingly not boring for an old show. Superhero shows can be disappointing in the long run because they just don’t ever go anywhere.
X- Men does suffer from that, but the continuity is good for the most part, the characters get well flushed out, and I like at least some of them. I can’t stand Scott…there is no version of Cyclops I’ve ever liked, old movies, new movies, or this how. Jean always bored me too. Though the Dark Phoenix movie was better than people gave it credit for, acting-wise anyway.
But anyway, this isn’t a review of the show.
As always, the shipping caught my eye. It’s not the best I’ve seen, the older shows usually are very non-committal about shipping, you were lucky if they even kissed.
This show handles it way better than most of its genre, so I got interested, even thought they don’t put a lot of effort into chemistry.
But what they do well is show people’s hang ups about getting into relationships.
The one they spend the most time on, with that, is Rogue x Gambit.
Being only a fan of the X-Men movies until now, and a distant fan at that, not die hard, I had not idea who Gambit even was, and Rogue was always just kind of a sad, scared little girl.
Well, I don’t know what those directors were thinking. Rogue’s character on tis show is the best part of it, along with Wolverine.
Gambit wasn’t as funny, in my opinion, at first, but he grew on me, and mellowed over the course of the show too, like Wolverine.
Anyway, the ship is not the best ship I’ve ever seen, but compared to the level I expected on an old 80s cartoon, it far surpassed it.
I mean, the shows of my generation were Kim Possilbe, the Animated Justice League, and old Spiderman and Batman and Superman. And while I liked all of those, and they have a few good ships in them, most of them don’t commit.
Gambit and Rogue, so far at least, don’t either. But no other show outside Justice League (once) really bothered to explore why, but this show does, and I think it’s interesting.
The romance is old fashioned for our time now, but Rogues’s character is well done, and her hang ups ring pretty true even today with what a lot of people express, so I thought it was worth using as an example.
Man, back then, characters could be interested in each other without shacking up, and it was just normal. Maybe not on every show, but one like this, made for kids, it was.
And unlike anime, which is so sexually repressed, yet bloated at the same time that they will devote multiple shots to grotesque fan service in every season yet act gun shy of having two healthy, normal characters kiss–these old American shows aren’t afraid to show kissing, and other physical forms of affection, without crossing over into the sexual.
I think it was more balance back then. Because they had standards to uphold they didn’t do stripping and naked women, and men showing their abs all the time, but because of that, they had no inherent shame implied if they kissed. They knew what we, the audience, would expect.
The pervy side of comics is a more recent evolution from the old stuff. There’s always been some pervs who would enjoy comic books (or any illustrated book) for the wrong reason, but the old art wasn’t that oversexualized, I’ve seen it. the new stuff is so gross. Ugly too, in my opinion.
Anime may not be ugly, but it has the same disproportionate, overdone factor to it, sorry, to sorry.
So it’s been nice to watch a romance that doesn’t shove fan service in my face. And is mature enough to at least acknowledge the problems.
Rogue’s obvious problem, if you know her power set and story, is that she can’t touch anyone.
There’s a few loopholes to this that the show ignores, like most superhero shows do. Such as the myriad of appearance of mutation blocking technology, which had the X-men chosen to keep any of it, Rogue could have used to manage her power when necessary.
So while the problem would easily be resolved if the rules of superhero shows didn’t dictate the heroes can’t be pragmatic (because there goes the drama then, right?) it isn’t so prevalent that her struggle doesn’t seem real.
Rogue does not wallow in angsty self pity, which I really appreciate. Anime emos get old after a while, they’re okay in moderation, but after a while you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all. We get it, you’re sad…get a life.
Instead the writer made Rogue a strong person, who more takes a wry sense of humor about her inhibitions, though at some moments she shows how deeply it bothers her. It’s far more realistic, most of us don’t go through life pitying ourselves every minute of the day, and acting sad all the time, we take that wry point of view about our problems.
I think it’s healthier to do that than to purposefully be depressed. Enough sadness in life without dwelling on even more of it on purpose.
But it may be a better option still to try to heal.
The show does stop short of that. I think maybe they just didn’t know how to write it.
Rogue and Gambit’s ship actually serves to show Rogues’ issues more, which is how I think a ship should be used if it’s gong to be reoccurring, nothing like a romance to drive your true nature out.
The interesting ting about Rogue, and what makes her so much like us, is that she yearns for normal things, enjoys normal things, and want the kind of love she sees other people have–but she believes she can never have it.
So far it’s not been said, though i think it might be eventually, but her logic, we see, has to be no man is ever gong to commit to a girl he can’t touch. It’s just not gonna happen.
I find that intriguing.
I mean, the cynical person in me does kind of want to agree.
This is a world where we value sex above all else often enough in relationships. At least we do now. People will ship characters in fiction and in real life just because they want to see them have sex.
I do enjoy a good kiss scene myself in fiction.
And sex is a good thing, between married people. I’m 100% for that. I actually hate stories where married couples never have sex, for some stupid, contrived reason, to create drama. It’s a necessary part of marriage, if both people are capable of having sex, and don’t have sexual traumatic that might prevent them from engaging in it with ease. It’s selfish to deny your partner sex because you don’t feel like it, I think. We don’t not cook because we don’t feel like it, someone has to cook, even if you buy food. But that’s another story.
However, the idea that sex is the most important thing about marriage has been disputed.
Many couples, for health reasons, can’t have sex for many years of their marriage. Age can be one reason. But they can still feel fulfilled. It’s probably like eating sweets, sure you’d like to, but if you can’t, that’s not the end of your life. You can live without it.
Personally, I’m a 23 year old virgin. I’d like to have sex at some point in my life, I believe it’s a God given gift. BUT, I would, at least now, prefer a man who’d be the right emotional match for me more.
I mean, if you gave me the choice, great sex for the rest of my life, or, being with someone who would day in and day out try their hardest to make me happy, and would let me make them happy…someone I could always turn to, who would not lie to me, and who would make the best of whatever situation we fell into…I think I could abstain from sex for that. I hear the older you get, the less sex seems like it’s so important. C. S. Lewis said that he’d choose affection and loyalty over sexual excitement, now that he was older.
I might be young but I’m not stupid, guys. Trust is more important. Sex is icing on the cake of love, not the main ingredient.
Of course, Rogue can’t even hold hands or kiss. She can embrace a bit with gloves and clothes on, but not as much as she wants to.
I imagine, if the show were allowed to discuss this, she’d probably verbalize the thought that it’s just not fair to ask any man to put up with that kind of restriction.
What’s funny is that, for all her longing, she is the one who shoves Gambit away in their quasi, flirtatious relationship. Gambit never seems bothered by her mutant power, and is very outgoing about how he flirts, he even is the one to say “I love you” first–and so far, the only one.
Rogue is very insecure.
Funny how she’s confident most of the time, but anytime he’s open about it, she pushes him away, sometime literally. And walks away herself, and acts irritated.
But also gets jealous and begs for attention.
None of it is to the extent where she’s Toxic, I can’t imagine Rogue being toxic, she’s too sweet, but she’s so clearly at war with herself, and it’s shown really well.
The heartbreaking thing to think about is that Rogue is really just a dramatization of a very real feeling many of us have.
Rogue was rejected by her Daddy, as she tells us, and then abused by her surrogate mother, in a way, mystique.
After such experiences, it makes sense she has trust issues. But really, she has self worth issues.
It’s all too familiar to me.
I’m taken back to my emotional abusive household as a kid.
Both my parents, though more my father, would use me being upset as a reason to act like I was attacking them.
I loved my parents, even in my most angsty years, and I don’t recall ever saying I hated them, or saying anything particularly cruel, though I maybe have just forgotten. But I always knew words had power, that’s what they taught me.
The message my father gave me, sometimes to my face, was that he had enough stress in his life without dealing with me also.
This led to me feeling like I was just a bad reminder to him of this gaping issues, which was our relationship. A relationship he sabotaged himself from the time I was born, and all through my formative years. Then he destroyed it openly when I was a teenager. Always it was he who would reject, he who would say the most hurtful things, he who would judge me.
If I fought back, or tried to complain, I was told I was the problem, and it wasn’t my place to correct him. Then he would tell us to correct him, and that we were right, and the next time we did, it was the same thing, it wasn’t our place. He’d even threaten me if I tried.
I learned to just keep my mouth shut, and when I learned that, he began picking fights with me on purpose. He couldn’t go more than a few days without some toxic outburst, I think he was addicted to it, personally.
All this lined up with what I learned about abusive behavior once he was gone.
But what it stamped on me, perhaps permanently, is that the people closest to you are the ones you will hurt the most.
I knew I had hurt my parents even if it was mostly their own fault, and I knew I hurt my sisters too, the people who I later came to rely on more for support.
And the fact is, if you love someone, you will still hurt them, because you are a flawed, imperfect human.
I’ve said things to friends, not thinking how they sounded, and meaning it to be funny that hurt them badly, and I never knew till later. Some people realized that and brushed it off, others never forget.
I’ve found that people from emotionally abusive homes often share this belief that I have, which is that when you love someone, you hurt them.
Oddly, I don’t find that attitude in accounts by people with happy families, who kept their trust.
People who rebel against their good parents may come to think that way, but that’s not everyone.
And those of us who’ve been let down the most by people we love, believe it the most.
To us, love is associated with pain.
A lot of us abused kids don’t want to give up on love, we know we’re meant to love, so we accept the pain of it, but we have a harder time accepting that we will cause people pain.
In our minds, since the love we were shown was conditional, and we took on the brunt of forgiving the other person, but never get their forgiveness in return, then every wound we cause is far worse than the ones they give us.
You see, we normally don’t struggle with our half of it. They hurt us, we shake it off, we don’t think it’s that important.
But we hurt them at all, and we feel horrible. We feel unworthy of love, and we think it’d be better if we just stayed away from them–but we know that will hurt too, and we feel stuck.
Rogue is such a perfect type of this kind of person. I think it’s fitting she was written to have abusive parental figures.
Though the show frames it as being about her mutation, it could have been about anything. That was the genius of the X-men, they used mutation as a metaphor for anything that makes people seem a little different.
And Rogue is like if that attitude was to take physical form in your body. If the fact that you can’t get close to someone without hurting them sometimes was made a trait in your DNA.
Because, in a way, it is.
Since the fall of man, we humans have turned on each other.
We make such a big deal out of racism and bigotry now, like it’s the worst sin of all, but, if you’re not hurting someone one way, you’d just do it another way. Racism can be less giant int he long run than many other human evils, depends on the kind of racism.
I just think it’s like we expect perfection out of humans. Looking down on each other for stupid reason has been a part of us for millennium, it’s not any one group of people’s exclusive fault, we just hate each other, because we fear each other.
We fear what’s different, because we know we’re not prepared for it. We cannot understand, so we don’t try. That’s what we think.
If it doesn’t lead to racism, it leads to something else, like the fear of intimacy.
When we damaged people hit this flaw in ourselves, it’s easy to get depressed.
It has depressed me many times to realize I can’t get away from not being perfect.
As a Christian, I am promised that one day I will be perfect as Christ it perfect.
But Jesus was still hurt by people, probably more than anyone else ever has been, because he truly was innocent. but no doubt his followers took his honesty the wrong way at times, and were hurt. Jesus must have known people will be hurt, even if you are in the right. Sometimes that hurts worse than being wrong. You ever had your parents say they hate punishing you?
My dad used to say that, I wish it extended to his abuse. He never liked to spank us much when we deserved it, but would be forceful over minor, stupid stuff that wasn’t even bad. I never understood that.
I doubt it would make Rogue feel better to hear that it’s not her fault. She’s in our position, she can’t help it, and she knows it, and that’s what hurts. We’re most ashamed of what we can’t help, as C. S. Lewis observed.
She’s kind of like Shigaraki from MHA, in a way. Though he can control his quirk now, he seems to shy away form touching people because, subconsciously, he remembers what happened when he did and lost control.
Rogue hasn’t killed anyone, but she’s hurt them pretty badly.
There’s a lot of characters like that in superhero fiction, I think it’s because people play out their insecurities in superhero writing. It’s when we most want to portray ourselves as heroes that we find ourselves seeing weaknesses and reasons why we can’t be. We tend to project that onto some characters, and then project our fantasy of a savoir onto others. Hence MHA has Deku and All Might, and the X- Men have professor X.
But the X-Men is a bit more honest about it than MHA, they know that Prof X can’t really fix these problems.
While there may be a solution, people often accept their circumstances. Don’t I know that feeling?
I’ve never been able to fully accept suffering as normal, but I have been tempted. Who hasn’t?
Like Rogue, and so many other victims, I yearn for more, but when I get it, I push it away.
I’m at least catching onto to this habit, and learning to stop doing it, but Rogue probably hasn’t noticed it, because like so many real people, she has no one around her to reflect it back at her. Al lot of us never realize this on our own, that’s they therapy can be beneficial. If it’s good therapy.
When we feel like we’re wrong, deeply, something inside us is, it’s hard to open up.
And what’s sad is that some of us, like Rogue, do have people around us who accept us.
Gambit never shows any fear of Rogue, as I said. And pushes more for the relationship than she does, but Rogue seldom acknowledges it. She’s scared, he’s not.
Gambit of course has to be well aware of the reasons, she’s quite vocal about it.
But while he says he doesn’t care, Rogue isn’t willing to risk it, even if he is.
And of course, realistically, Gambit knows that there’s only so far they could go. How could they ever have kids?
Metaphorically, one could see it as one realizing that all human intimacy is never going to be enough to satisfy us. Not fully.
Of course, we Christians say that’s because we need God. When you have God, you can let man be man.
Rogue does actually express the wish to know more about God on the old show, because you could do that back then and not get cancelled by social media, but the show didn’t take it farther than that.
I wonder if she would find peace in believing that God loves her, and is the One person she can’t hurt.
That was one thought that kept me sane in some of my more self hating moments, knowing I can’t hurt God. Sometimes I want to, it’s horrible, but I want to take out my anger on someone, and I know He will not hurt me, not like my dad would. It’s a sad truth.
God usually doesn’t answer when I do that, and then I feel alone, but I’ve started to realize it is me who’s pulling away, not him.
So yeah, Rogue’s actions hit home in that way too.
I know that God values me, I just don’t accept it when I should. I find it hard to believe.
I think Rogue reflects the way victims feel that even if others are willing to be hurt by them, they don’t deserve that kind of grace.
It’s hard to hear, but it’s not like Rogue is the only one with this problem. Scott can never look anyone in the eyes without glasses on, Beast is…a beast. There are other mutants who can hurt people easily with their powers. Rogue can at least cover hers up.
And she sees no issues without other people getting their happiness, but can’t see it for herself.
I think she believes Gambit would never commit anyway, though he seems more than wiling to do so, though he can also be a bit of a flirt, but then so can she…the real issue both of them have is they won’t be honest about what they want.
Many victims just don’t know. I don’t know what I want, often.
I know it a little better now. Other than I don’t want someone like my dad, I have begun to learn what positive traits I want.
But we can swing the other way and look for perfection. We are drawn to the familiar, but repulsed by it when it lets us down.
I think I am at least not drawn to my dad’s cruelty anymore.
I may always like banter, as a permanent mark of growing up with him, but banter doesn’t have to be cruel.
I recently had an annoying time with a guy at my school who liked to say snide things to me, not sure he really knew they were snide, I could never tell if he was rude on purpose, or just stupid, but either way, it reminded me to much of how my dad would mock me.
This guy was hot, not gonna lie, but I couldn’t be attracted to his personality enough for that to be a plus. It’s like gilding a bitter pill, really.
I don’t hate this guy, I don’t even think he’s the worse sort of person, but he’s not my type. Maybe some women could put up with him, I don’t know I they should, I think it’s up to them, but for me, it’s not a good idea to get close to someone like that. I’m already on the defensive, and I barely know him, that’s never a good sign.
But victim flock to it, to people who put them on the defensive, because we think that’s showing interest.
And perpetrators flock to people like that because they think that’s the kind of person who will support them.
But the trouble is, even if you take steps to become better, you could still miss what’s right in front of you.
To go back to Rogue and Gambit’s example, let’s look at it more seriously.
So, Rogue is right, it would never be easy or simple for her to be with someone. And Gambit might need to acknowledge that a bit more.
I mean, if the love each other, they may still never be together, just because she thinks it’s not fair.
The question is, is that a valid reason?
I’ve read of people deciding not to marry because of health reasons, just because it wouldn’t be possible for them to have children. In Charles Dicken’s OliverTwist, there’s a woman who won’t marry a man because she has a stain on her ancestry and doesn’t want to drag him down with her, it’s no fault of her own, but she feels like it would be irresponsible.
Heck, even goofy movies like MadMonsterParty hold out the idea that you can refuse to marry someone because you think you’re no good for them.
And many people in real life self foil because they think they are the wrong person emotionally for someone else. And they feel selfish if they do get involved with someone.
I hope one day I will stop feeling guilty for asking for help. And for people making sacrifices for me. I wish I didn’t have to ask. But I have to tell myself now that it’s okay for me to have my needs met. Not to the exclusive of everyone else’s, but that it won’t hurt them if I do. And even if someone does get hurt, it can be mended.
The magic thing about love is that it makes pain seem unimportant compared to the love.
There are difficulties to any relationship. Some people decide to be together despite that, because they figure the love is more important. That was the story of many interracial couples, and still is, interracial marriage is still looked down on even in America…and it’s not always the white side of it, either. I heard a comedian who was black talking about how black men asked her why she married a white guy. Couldn’t a black brother lover her better?
I can’t even begin to explain how disgusting that is, and yet it’s seen as normal to have that reaction.
But there are difficulties, we can’t pretend there aren’t.
While it’s minimal now, there were health risks in the past when interracial couples had children, the blood type could be a problem.
So in that case, a situation like Rogue’s becomes a reality. A mother can hurt her own child by having different blood from them. They can fix it now, but back when they couldn’t, it was a gamble.
I thought it was poetic they made Gambit the other half of this ship. What is love but a gambit? Even if you marry someone who you know is good and honorable, you risk them hurting you by accident, even physically, accidents happen. Things you don’t expect happen. There are other problems that arise.
One of you can get sick, or die. There is always risk.
But the way couples have answered this since Eden, has always been the same.
It’s better to have love, while you can, and to cherish it, then to live without it. Love is worth the risk. Love is, or nothing is.
And it seems to me that’s how God meant it to be. He chose to create us, knowing full well we’d break His heart a million times a year with our problems, but He is Love. He cannot be anything else, and to Him, Love is what matters, pain is not what He’s afraid of. God is never afraid, that’s His advantage over us.
But what God values form us, is that even though we are human, and cannot help feeling fear, we still choose to love. Our faith is precious to Him because we can do it in spite of being imperfect, something He could not do, as God, except through becoming a man.
That’s why I still want to marry, and have children.
I’ve seen it go wrong, I know how much it hurts. It has hurt me more than anything else in my life.
I can think my parents for many of my emotional problems, and health problems too. That hurts.
And I know I will likely repeat at least some of their mistakes until I learn better.
But, I still want love. Because I think Love matters more than pain. I am afraid to love, of course, it’s a risk. But I still want to try. God help me to do it right.
Some have said that if love doesn’t hurt, it’s not real.
I don’t think love has to hurt all the time, but if it doesn’t sometimes, I think you’re delusional, even God suffers for love. It’s normal.
It’s not easy but it’s normal.
And I pray I find a man who shares my view of it. They are rare, but there’s a few out there. Heck, I don’t want a perfect man, that would be freaky, I just want one who shares my idea of love.
It’s easier to find a perfectionist than a real Lover in the old sense of the word, but one has to try.
I doubt the X-Men show ever went that far, but it’s interesting that the set up at least was there. If people would just be honest with themselves and each other about what they are willing to risk.
Well, this ran long, I do get on a roll about love.
Hey, it’s been awhile. I know, I’m sorry, I was writing other stuff.
I decided to do another fandom post, why not?
Let’s talk about crack ships.
I’ve been on Wattpad a lot lately (uploading fan fiction) and I discovered that peopel acutally write whole fics that are just analyzing ships…and people actually read that.
Okay, to be honest, I read it too, but I thought I was the only one who cared why people ship things. Like, I like discussing pros and cons, but from what I see in fandoms it usually is just “It’s cute and sexy so I ship.”
I never ship stuff based off that alone, usually. But I enjoy cute and sexy as much at the next girl, I suppose.
(my version of sexy is probably pretty homeschooled, though.)
Anyway, in the mha fandom there’s been a ship since last year or so that’s gotten a following for being a crack ship, and it got me thinking why do people ship crack ships?
I always thought it was sexual addiction, honestly. I mean, I’ve shipped a crack ship maybe once or twice because of a fan fic I wrote where it kind of made sense, but I don’t take it seriously outside of that. So I never got it.
And I was a little judgy about it, to be honest.
But I really don’t care if people ship Jack Frost x Elsa, or whatever, if they want to do that. The crack ships I find disturbing are the ones between adults and kids, or siblings, or other inappropriate people.
You can ship whatever you want if it’s not creepy, I think, but don’t make it creepy, guys…
So the ship that got my attention on all of this was DustBunny, or ShigarakiXMirko.
I never heard of it till I clicked on this one video on YT, and I thought “this cannot be a thing…what?”
But then I watched it and it was funny, and I thought “okay, I see why people think it’s funny, but is are they serious?
And a lot of fans think shippers are crack heads, especially crack shippers, kind of goes with the name…
I’m here to say you all should just screw off if you’re going to seriously think that shipping is weirder than the stats arguments you other nerds get into over shows and movies and books.
I mean critisize me for shipping if you think it’s bizarre, but don’t act like it’s weirder than what the “intellectual” fans do, for crying out loud. I can’t stand hypocrisy.
Anyway, I’m not trying to start a fight, just saying people should stop acting like it’s better to be a weird fan for one thing than for another, it’s all the same, isn’t it?
Except people who consume content just to get sexual pleasure out of it…that’s weird.
Anyway, why should any of you care?
I assume you like ships if you’re reading this, so let’s ignore that part.
Is it worth it to analyze a crack ship, that’s the question I want to answer.
[I’m also going to talk about why this particular kind of Crack Ship is so popular, and why I think it matters in the second half of this post, so read to the end if you want the deep stuff.]
Firstly, I think it depends on what you mean by worthit.
Will it make it more likely to happen? No.
We all know crack ships will probably never happen, ever.
But is it worth it to ask why people like it? Sure.
There’s always people who are in it just for the sexual content, but there’s always some people who actually put real thought into it.
And if you can’t judge humanity by the person, I think you can’t judge shippers by them either.
I mean romance is something most people want, so why let the perverts out there stop you from appreciating it, that’s my attitude.
And whie you don’t have to ship Dustbunny to understand what I’m saying, I’m going to use it to illustrate what I mean:
First of all, a crack shp has to be between people who it doesn’t make a whole lot of canon sense for them to be together.
The reason is that it strongly appeals to some people to change canon.
Some are just perves, again, but for the more serious cases, I notice a trend.
Crack ships tend to pop up around characters people think are lacking something. Whether it’s that they are lonely, or perhaps morally bankrupt, or too arrogant, people use a ship as a vehicle to imagine character development within.
And whether the two halves of the ship even know each other is not really the point. The person is picked base on the trait the shipper thinks will help the other person the most.
Case in pont: In MHA, Shigakria and Mirko have never met…and may never meet, quite frankly.
But that just makes it better for a crackshipper, because there are no limitations that way.
They won’t look at facts, the look at possibilities.
I call it “what if” scenarios, (and that was before I found out that was a kind of fan fiction, btw)
And you may ask “if it’s not going to happen, then who cares?”
My answer to that is: You can’t go through life thinking of what seems like it’s possible, and expect to ever exceed very mediocre expectations.
I mean, everything looks impossible and unlikely to us until it happens. When you were a kid, driving a car, tying your shoe, or riding a bike seemed like it would never happen. It was a whole new world of rules and skills you did not have. When you didn’t know how to read, reading seemed out of reach. Books were a thing you didn’t get.
Then you learn those skills, and you can’t imagine not being able to do it anymore. When you really learn something it’s hard to forget it.
It’s called expanding our horizons.
Stranger things have happened in real life than it would take to make most crack ships happen, if you chose to take that route.
2. The second objection that might be made is that ships like this are creepy and weird, not becuase of age gaps or being related, but because they are built on nothing and are often between characters on opposite sides of the good-evil conflict.
That’s more likely because if they were on the same side, chances are they would interact, and it wouldn’t be 100% a crack ship then, there would be come canon material for it.
So a hero-vilia ship is usually a crack ship, I’ve seen a few canon ones from time to time. I actually usually enjoy them. You can’t beat stakes like that.
But mostly, it’s crack.
Sometimes they are creepy, I’ll give you that. And it’s probably always going to be weird.
But there are some objections I think miss the point.
One being: He or she is a villain.
Duh, that why people are shipping it, for the redemption arc part (more on that later)
Two: There’s a slight age gap.
An age gap of 5 years or so is not worth making a fuss over. Maybe after 8-10 years you could question it, but I think it’s only creepy if it’s between an adult than teenager/kid.
People will throw the age thing in there when it really shouldn’t mattter. Only dating people who are with 1 or 2 years of you is going to be pretty limiting, especially since people are at such different levels of maturity at any given age. I’m more mature at 22 than most of my older family members three times my age are. If I let age be the only factor I’d be in a tight spot.
Crack ships do often have bad age gaps though, but as I said those are the ones I do think are wrong.
The ones that are small, and that the only reason people are objecting…I just don’t get it. Pick a real reason, man.
Back to the moral question:
I think me and some other people wonder if it’s really okay to ship heroes and villains.
I mean, my whole objection to ship Toga from MHA with anyone, hero or villain, is that she’s psychotic, kills whoever she likes, and shipping her with anyone is kind of like saying you want them to die. (Which makes me wonder if all the people who ship her with Bakugo have ulterior motives.)
I don’t find it cute, sorry.
I think that’s one other objection that is valid.
People contemplate that crack ships ignore very important parts of the characters. Like that they are killers, or abusive.
Sadly, canon ships also do that, as Naruto proves…but yes, fans do it more.
It’s very true. Toga is one example. But you could name a bunch more if you’ve been in any fandom for a certain length of time.
And I don’t support that. I think if to ship someone, you have to ignore part of who they are, a big part, because it’s just too repulsive otherwise, then you cannot ship them. Unless you intend to rewrite the character entirely.
But then…it’s not really them anymore.
When I was younger and less mature I used to think that approach made sense, but now I don’t. If I have to change a character to like them, I just should like them. I can be mature enough to admit that.
Like, could I like Toga if I ignored her psychotic tenacies? Sure…probably, I’m not immune to the weird cute act the author pushes with her (why doe anime do that?).
But I refuse to overlook part of character in order to like it. She may be cute-ish, but she’s psycho, and not in a joking way, in a legitimately will murder you type of way. That’s not okay with me. If I wouldn’t ship it in real life I won’t ship it in a show either.
But I don’t think Dustbunny and other ships like it are on the same playing field.
You have to look at the characters involved. Shigaraki is not like Toga. He’s crazy…ish. But we also have signs that he can be more human, self controlled, and mature than she’s ever going to be.
And then if you are caught up on his backstory, you have a reason to think he was not naturally the way he is. All For One has trained him to be sick and twisted. But if you can be trained one way, you can be trained another.
I was watching one video and some idiot commenter was saying that Shigaraki justifies his actions because of his trauma, which is just not okay, because characters who have it just as bad as him are still good.
And I thought “When has Shigaraki ever justified anything he does because of trauma?” I can’t name a time. He claims he has the right to do it, because AFO taught him that, but he never says it’s good, or that it’s okay because of what happened to him. He does not really seem to think about what happened to him as unfair, he thinks he is just made to destroy (again, thanks to AFO).
Seriously, do we even watch the same show. Dabi justifies his actions because of his past, so does Twice, so does Spinner. All a bunch of victims, really. But Shigaraki doesn’t. He is brainwashed into thinking he should destroy by his ever helpful and despicable master. Talk about blaming the victim.
Unlike Toga, who actively seeks out twisted things as part of her whole schtick about doing what she wants.
Shigaraki is always referring to AFO teaching him to be this way, like he knows he didn’t come up with it himself.
That give the redemption arc fan a hope he might be made to see it’s all a lie.
Not much of a hope, perhaps. but there is some.
(And for the record, I’m still saying it’s going to happen, though not because of this ship, but I think if I’m trope savvy, that’s what’s coming. )
I guess this is kind of a hot take on Shigaraki’s character, as well as the ship.
The reason I need to talk about both is because people object to the ship because they think he’s a schmuck who cannot be redeemed.
And that’s hypocritical, because most people who complain about that will ship other stuff if they like it, regardless of how bad the person is, but whatever.
If that was true, I’d agree, it’s useless to ship. It’s like shipping Emperor Palpatine with someone, I’m sure people do, but decent people don’t talk about it.
But I actually like ships for villains who are more victims of other villains, because the ship is sort of a vehicle to introduce the idea of happiness to them. Something they would fight for, something they might defy their programming for.
I mean if you won’t do it for love, what will you change for?
I was watching a video about the enemies to lovers trope earlier today that basically summed up how I think of it.
It’s hard to reform villains in a way that makes sense in story. Either you do what Avatar did, and humble them through hardship and the truth about their past, but that is not going to work for every villain, obviously, if they already know their past and are evil because of that.
Your other option is for the villain to start to care about something.
(We’re gong to ignore the Naturo/shonen anime standard of beating them into submission and then they somehow have a change of heart. That never works irl.)
What would the villain carea bout?
Maybe there’s a vague good concept you could try, but most often, it has to be another person. What else can get past our defenses?
It can be their son or father, like in Star Wars, but family is always a gamble at the motivation for reforming. It might work, but then, if they cared about their family at all, why would they be evil?
MHA did this with Endeavor, but Endeavor also change because he realized getting what he wanted was not really what he wanted, and he didn’t get it the way he had wanted it anyway. That humbles him, and he starts looking to be a good dad as an alternative goal to outdoing All Might.
Very well done, but rare in real life. I would know.
So, what many authors do is use a romantic love interest. The reasons are simple.
A: Romantic feelings are some of the most powerful ones we experience, they can make people do both good and bad things, crazy things, or beautiful things, depending on what kind of person you are.
B: A Love interest is usually someone new, someone the villain cannot already resent the same way they would old friends or family. Someone who can surprise them and defy expectations.
Most redemption arcs turn on the idea of “new”
I mean, it’s biblical isn’t it? A new life, a new heart, a new spirit, that’s what we’re told. A new beginning.
You need the “new” Much more than the old to redeem someone, both in real life and in fiction.
Because it’s “new” You always run the risk of people rejecting it, but if they can accept it, that’s where real change comes in.
And that is why Enemies to Lovers is so popular. It allows both people to become new, and do new things, have new feelings. But still be themselves.
And, what no one talks about, but I think we should, it’s also most of the Bible, if not all of it.
God’s dialogues with the people of Israel, Judah, and then the Church, all read like they’re describing an enemies to lovers ship between a hero and villain.
God leaments the poor decisions His people make, and gets angry at them, but then He promises they will become new, and He would love them and heal them if they just come back to him.
We all crave that in the enemies to lovers story, and any other romance story.
Gd compares his relationship with us to a marriage for a reason.
Marriage captures something about God and us that no other relationshp can.
Friendship relies on the idea of being equal to each other.
Parent/child, relies on the idea of being unequal but still loving and giving to each other, even knowing it will never be an equivalent exchange.
But the idea of lovers is more than that.
Romance doesn’t even ask if you are equals (unless you want to kill it), it doesn’t ask who’s giving more. At the peak of romantic feelings, both people only care about seeing and drinking in the other person.
And so, it makes sense that for God, the absolute climax and epitome of closeness to us is where we’ve forgotten who’s more powerful, and who’s able to give more. We give all of ourselves, and God gives all Of Himself, and who cares which is more, none of us will think of it anymore. God never seems to think of it at all except to teach us humility.
The pinnacle of Love is to stop caring about measuring or defining it by anything, and to just do it, be it, really.
I now, a lot of us can’t imagine that. I’ts pretty much a forgotten idea, but I still find traces of it sometimes even in modern stories.
Now, a fiction trope can not begin to encomapps taht, but I would defend the Enemies to Lovers trope at one of the few that can even get a taste of it.
Relating all this back to Dustbunny, I won’t claim it’s quite what I’m talking about.
But my goal was to defend the legitimacy of shipping these kinds of ships. Even if it’s mostly for fun, we need the idea that people an be redeemed, especially by love, to stay alive.
I’m actually kind of concerned by how hard people find it to understand this simple idea, we want redemption.
We’re made to want it, and people who hate on fans who vie for it are…well, kind of pathetic. And it’s almost inhuman.
Hate on a ship for any other reason, but hating it because it requires redemption to work…I mean, do you know any healthy couples in real life?
The truth is, peeps, there is going to be an element of enemiestolovers in every real relationship you ever have. We are all the villain sometimes, and we can hope, we are all also the hero. I’ve been both, you have too.
And if we cannot, even in concept, agree with the idea that we will need redemption, and that it will come because of love, I don’t think we should be in a relationship at all.
If you cannot admit your’e the villain sometimes, but also rise up to being the hero, you are not ready for love. Even the more family affection type of love has elements like that in it. And deeper friendships do too, but superficial ones don’t.
That’s where it is people.
My opinion is, if you hate on enemies to lovers for the sole reason it’s that, you have issues, and are probably a narcissist. We all have to change, we all have to transform. Especially in marriage.
Someone else said that the beauty of Enemies to Lovers is that is is someone seeing all the worse parts of you first, and still being able to fall in love with you. We all hope to have enough good in s for someone to love us even if they see our bad.
I think that is so true.
And hot…just saying.
But even for me, who’s never dated (not for lack of wishing), I can see why it appeals to us.
We’re all insecure. It’s been popularized to just own it and like that you have flaws, but that’s bullcrap. If you like your flaw, it’s not a flaw, is it?
But the more honest among us now that, and we just want someone to look past it.
I was taught from birth on upward that my flaws were too big of an obstacle to love me. That my pain would make it impossible for me to be cared for, and that my boldness would drive everyone away.
I still struggle with believing anything different than that. I’ve met a lot of weak people who refuse to get close to me because of my edges.
I’m not a mean person, no one would tell you that, I just have a lot of fire and at times I may be harsh without knowing it. Working on that. But never with any real intent to be cruel. Some people get that about me, and others refuse to.
I have learned though, that people will back off from whoever they think is tougher than them.
So maybe I like that Enemies to Lovers trope for that reason. It happens in real life, people have attested to it, and I hope that there is someone who will treat me that way.
I like the idea that what repels some people about me would attract someone else, the right person. I just have to find them.
I think also, the loneliness factor is thing. Villains are lonely, so when the trope is hero-villain specifically, we can relate. Heroes can be lonely too.
As Shakespeare pointed out, we are the most like God when we show mercy, and that is what Enemies to Lover is about. having mercy, maybe on ourselves as well as the other person, since often there is a moment where one or both halves of the ship realize they were wrong and did some bad stuff.
It’s about hope, too.
Basically, it’s like God towards us, and I find that beautiful.
the Bible says “love covers a multitude of sins.”
It better, right? Or what would all of us do?
So with that really in depth take on this, I think I’ll end, and I’ll see you all next time–Natasha.
I do have a lot of subjects to write about right now.
I tend to avoid politics on this blog unless something catches my attention, but I’m always thinking about culture.
Something I’ve been thinking about it lately is how in Church, we often go with the flow. We address issues that the world thinks are important, but we neglect the ones they don’t think about.
Not that it’s wrong to address things the world thinks about, I think we have to, in a way.
But also, looking at The Gospels, I find it odd that Jesus didn’t spend all that much time talking about what the world thought was important.
Under Roman Occupation, he didn’t talk much about the Romans. He addressed it from time to time as people asked him, but His long sermons are not about that.
He didn’t talk about te libeiton of the Jews from Romans, but from sin.
And looking around nowadays, I wonder if he’d be any different.
It’s so easy to get distracted by what’s gong on around us.
Things about race, gender, and nationality, it’s all anyone wants to talk about now.
And people are demanding respect and taking pride in these things.
Even christians, too many Christians.
My church, which is one of the better ones I think, still has a little group of LGBT people who attend. I don’t care if they attend, but their attitude about it makes me wonder if they come only because the church does not call out the world on that not being biblical.
I was talking to my cousin and his friend about the Bible’s stance on homosexuality, and why it’s consider wrong, just an open conversion, no hate, and explain it well,
And they didn’t really disagree with my points, or that I don’t like how kids are encouraged to vote on sexual topics they do not really understand yet.
But they admitted that they are afraid to express and negative views of it because the have friends or family who subscribes to it all, and are going to be livid if they disagree.
I acknowledged it’s hard in this culture to think for yourself…it’s always is hard in any culture to go against the flow.
But I told them as a Christian, I can’ just ignore it. I can’t blend in. It’s not allowed.
And that’s how I see it.
Sure, it’d be easier to walk around my liberal campus wearing some pro LGBTQ badge, and deck out my car and say that God loves gay people (which He does, but people use that phrase to mean something totally different, that God loves their lifestyle, and that is just no biblical), and play that game.
People claim it’s so hard to support the community. Are you kidding me? It’s so flipping easy. It’s easier to do that than to have an original thought, that’s for sure.
Instant approval, instant clicks, people commending you for sticking up for it. As well as BLM, and Feminism, and everything else.
Sheesh, to get approval just for saying words, whether you ever act on it or not, is so stupid.
“26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Romans 1)
I find it disgusting to cater to this. I’d like to get the clicks, view, and likes that the people who do this get, but I’m not willing to bend myself in order to get it. There’s more important things than likes out there, people.
Someday no doubt that’s going to get me cancelled if I’m every popular enough for anyone to care what I think…but oh well, they cancelled all the Apostles too…to the extreme.
It’s getting extreme here too. People are attacking churches more and more. What’s funny is the church’es stance isn’t even that strongly put in the West, but they attack us anyway.
Islam is actually harsher on homosexuality than Christian is, but I never hear of the LGBTQ community attacking mosques…you know, because Muslims actually might fight back…at least, I assume that’s the reason.
Yeah, so brave. Attack the people who won’t retaliate. But that’s always the way isn’t it.
I’m not here to hate on gay people, I’m just trying to be honest about it all.
And it’s not just gay people, it’s all groups now.
I don’t voice my opinions too loudly at my college because I’m pretty sure I’d lose my grades over it, so I mostly only discuss it out of class. And starting a fight in the middle of a lecture does seem rude.
But I don’t cater to it either.
And it’s all good to preach and teach about how we need to love ourselves and respect ourselves, and not be too harsh…
But when is it time to talk about going against the flow? When do we talk about what no one wants to hear?
Cause I can tell you, the problem with our culture isn’t really all the Pride stuff, that’s just a symptom.
It’s how prideful we are in our personal lives, self seeking, comfort seeking.
We do give lipservice to this in church, but we don’t actually enforce it. We don’t ask people to do more than they feel like doing. We don’t reward people for being strong in their convictions. Instead we think they are too worked up.
Even I think that.
Of course, it is true sometimes. But I’ve gotten reprimanded for protesting that a Youth Leader played songs that talked about sex and making out with the same gender on the way home from a mission trip…yeah….
Am I really the problem in this scenario?
Her excuse? “This is what those kids listen to.”
My thoughts? “This is what you listen to. What’s your point? It was still wrong.”
I can’t tell people what to listen to at home, but on a public trip? With the church?
That was yeas ago now, I don’t think i would happen with our current youth leaders, but that it happened at all was boring, because I knew it wasn’t just this one person, I’ve met so many people like his.
I’ve always gotten a rep for being more vigilant about this stuff, and I’ve had people tell me they were sorry for no having a better attitude about it, but they have never acted like my friends.
And, I’m not a super conservative person. I mean, I watch anime, I read fan fiction, and I listen to songs with cuss words in them…now.
And I don’t like that part, but I decided that I’m not going to be able to avoid cuss words in life, and it doesn’t make the whole song bad if the song is about a good thing, and they use saltier language. But I don’t listen to songs about sex, drugs, and hooking up. I want the message to be good.
I won’t throw out Evanescence because of a few swears, but I won’t listen to “shape of you” just because it has no swearing, sine it’s just about hooking up for a night. You get my point?
And I can’t force that standard on anyone, but I do have it for a reason, and I don’t have an issue telling people that.
This is not even the biggest problem, but my thought is that people would not give up anything they happen to like in the world, even if it was the right thing to do. God may tell me to stop listening to and reading and watching his fault I have prayed about it, and I am careful, though I do need to reevaluate somethings from time to time.
But I do think about it, I don’t get the feeling other people often do, I’ve talked to a few who mentioned it, but don’t mention every dropping something because of it.
I’m trying to be less judgmental than I used to be.
Like when it comes to smut, I believe it’s wrong to read it, but I dont think someone is horrible if they are tempted to. I’m not immune to this stuff either, I have hormones, I’m not dead.
But I have to seriously think about what I want my idea of sex and love to be when I do get married. Do I want to think it’s all about the body? Or do I want it to be about what’s inside, the soul, the mind, the heart?
And I’ll admit, sex can be more than just a physical experience, the Bible is clear about that, but I think smut (porn, you now) kind of makes that worse, not better. People with a porn addiction usually admit that real life sex gets less satisfying if you’ve fed yourself this fake image of it.
Porn and smut are all about making something so flawless it’s no longer real.
And in real life, emotional moment can be awkward even at their most heartfelt, people are damaged, and that gets in the way.
And our bodies are not flawless, even a model has blemishes somewhere.
And we have hygiene and weight issues at different times, or we can get sick. Women have periods, you get my drift? No one is sexy all the time.
If you grow up expecting that, then you aren’t going to be disappointed by sex, because you’ll expect it to be like everything else in life, a thing you do that improve with time, but is not perfect.
But if you grow with the porn version of this, you think sex is somehow unlike other human experiences, it can be flawless.
In the end it sets you up for less, not more pleasure. And that is one reason the Church has never endorsed it.
People think the church discourages sex, and while some churches do, the faith itself doesn’t.
In fact, it encourages it. A lot. Sex with responsibility.
And on that note, I don’t see how recreational sex is a great foundation for a really mature relationship. You treat sex cavalierly, and it’s the only thing that makes marriage different from other relationships. So what make it special to be married then? Might as well just be friends with benefits.
And that about all marriage amounts to now with a lot of couples. I think they are puzzled as to why it’s so unfulfilling.
I’m not saying it never woks out, some people just know how to make it work, but the thing is, marriage used to be something people were expected to figure out, whether it came naturally to them or not, and not it’s seen as a matter of finding the right match to perfectly balance you out.
I think you should date with that in mind, but if you end up marrying someone who doesn’t suit you perfectly, that’ s no reason to throw it out. If you’re not married to a psycho or a pig, you can probably find a way to work stuff out. People just don’t want to be inconvenienced.
And I say that because I’ve had the same experience in friendship. People cannot handle the smallest bit of friction and they bail as soon as conflict happens. I’ve had that happen to me so many times. Because, I’m replaceable, in a world of shallow friendships, and online friendships, if someone annoys you or disagrees with you, why not just dump them?
And if I’m not replaceable, you would never know, because you didn’t get that close to me.
I get it though, I’ve felt the pain for being ditched so many times because I don’t view people that way, and it stings to lose them. I’m working on being okay with that.
But therapy wasn’t the most helpful here because the attitude in therapy is that people are not worth your time if they piss you off.
And that’s kind of a shallow way to look at it.
Someone may piss me off because I have a problem, not them. Or we both do.
Maybe people are worth keeping around.
But you won’t hear that idea anymore in mainstream culture.
It’s not wonder we’re all dying of loneliness, we’re okay with supporting people as long as they are needy, lost lambs, with a victim mentality.
But if someone has a really different perspective, and is just hard to deal with, ditch them.
Perhaps I am annoyed because it doesn’t end well for me, and okay, that’s a fair point.
But I also don’t shut people out of my life just for disagreeing with me, so….
The double standard annoys me, if I was to do that as a Christian I’d be judgmental. But if they are just not “comfortable” round me, that’s their right, they don’t need to get over it.
I have gotten more attention from people when I was upset in front of them, and treated more nicely, than when I’m just my regular, more confident self.
I don’t mind if they comfort me, I just wonder why it goes away after that. I kind of learned the hard way that sympathy doesn’t equal a real bond.
(Something Naruto really needed to learn in Shippunden.)
This is why I think we really have too much attention on ourselves now.
We are narcissistic.
I can be too, but I am aware of it and trying to get better. The point is, the culture encourages me to be self centered, and often the church does too.
We have to be aware of these influences, if we’re going to be better, and set apart.
Or we’ll be like ships on the ocean, “infants tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine.” (Ephesians 4:14)
Doctrine could just mean any popular teaching now.
I think a good question to ask ourselves right now is: How far am I wiling to go to have self-actualization (or whatever you call it)
Willing to sacrifice the happiness of other people?
Willing to cut people out of my life who do not agree with my plan and decision making
Willing to promote it with violence, anger, and verbal attacks?
Willing to make others suffer if it gets me what I “need”
Willing to enforce laws about these things.
Willing to teach others to do the same, and support them even if their lifestyle is no good in other ways.
Willing to listen only to people who support me in this, and never fact check what they are saying.
If you answered yes to any of the above about anything, religion, race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic background, etc.
Then you are elevating that thing not only to your primary focus, (and that thing is yourself, in some form or another)
Also going to an extremist extent that many Believers would not even go to. I question sources within my religion, and I don’t condone violence done in the name of Jesus. My faith has checks and balances.
But the faith of Self Identity has no checks and balances, because you (Or I) are/am the final word on everything.
But if we all are, then none of us are, you see how that works?
Anyway, most people won’t admit that they are worshiping themselves?
How can I be a narcissist? I’m too smart for that. I’m too self aware. All my complaints are valid, all my actions are justified, all I want is reasonable, all I am is perfect. So I can not be a narcissistic.
And the scary thing is that sound like the lyrics to a popular song or a TED Talk.
Well, anyway, the first step is admitting you have a problem. literally. To stop being a narcissist, you have t admit you’re a narcissist, that’s when you begin to stop being one.
That said, I think I’ll end this for now. more posts coming soon.
I’ve also not had a lot to blog about, other than getting a new kitten (who’s doing great still btw, I wrote more about her here: New Kitten)
But an important milestone happened last month, it’s officially been 2 years since my dad moved out.
I cannot believe it’s been that long. Still feels like a few months ago he was here.
And I still can’t believe it was mostly my efforts that made it happen, with some help from my siblings.
It’s so weird. That’s a part I rarely tell people who actually know me, I feel like it would shock them. People already don’t get why I was happy about the whole thing.
In hindsight, I could have been more tactful about it, but I am an open book…
People have to get used to that about me, it’s a shock at first.
To this day, we do still feel bad about it at times. My dad didn’t hesitate to lay the guilt trip on thick when I did talk to him for the first time.
And it bothered me.
I still get dreams about it all too. They tend to make me doubt myself, my worth, my decisions. My sisters gets them too.
But the difference now is, he’s not here. We can replay all his words in our heads, but he’s not here to say them. At some point, either you embrace that or you don’t, I think.
Something that bugged me a lot about it all too is this:
Does Christianity really work?
If my mom and dad really believe, how can they act the way they do? Why are they not kinder?
But recently, I’ve realized I could ask myself the same questions.
Christianity ought to make me happy all the time, if it’s true. It’s truly an amazing belief. Puts everything in the right place, mean that life has a meaning beyond what we can imagine.
I think the very reason it doesn’t make me feel that way all the time is because humans cannot hold the whole truth in our heads for very long. You grow into it…
But really even a piece of Christianity is enough food for thought to last you your whole life, so the whole things is even harder.
Other religions usually just have piece of Christianity in them, and the make more of one thing than another. Then add their own stuff to it.
If we could fully realize it at all times, I think we would live completely differently always.
But our focus shifts from one element to another.
In my life, I’ve accepted that God highlights certain aspects of it for me when I need them. That I can’t try to focus on it all at once, I grow in one thing at one time, and another thing at another time. And hat is the only way I think we really can live.
If that’s not your life, you’re probably not grown at all.
And why would I want to exclude certain parts of it anyway? I want the whole picture.
All the immature Christians I know tend to end up stuck on one thing, and they refuse to leave it, ever.
You’ve met the type no doubt, if you life in the West. They harp on about judgment, or holiness, or grace, till you’re sick to death of it.
And you wonder “what about all the other elements of it?”
Yeah, being a well rounded Christian is kind of like being the avatar. You can’t rely too much on one element, you need all of them together, or you’re off balance.
God is a consuming fire, you have to know him as such–but he’s also the living water, and you need to know Him as that.
And really, that’s what make God interesting, isn’t it? As well as people, if you really get to know them.
We spend too much time in our niches now. It used to be you had a friend you learned different stuff about that friend.
But now I can have online friends for each interest i my life, and never need to go beyond that, ever. And it’s no wonder I feel like I don’t really know any of them that well.
That said, I can’t always know why some Christians don’t live the way I want.
But there’s two point to be made here.
Christians are never promised to be 100% perfect while on earth. We’re told that will not happen, n fact–and we wouldn’t’ be able to relate to anyone else if it did.
It’s entirely possible my idea of what everyone should live like is shallow and narrow minded. Do I know everything? No.
And those who criticize Christians for that reason are actually kind of arrogant. Like, you think you can judge us for still having issues? Do you have a better way of life? Are you doing so much better?
Christianity does not promise to fix all you problems overnight. It promises to save your soul.
What you do with that, is going to be a journey.
But whats the alternative?
I’m convinced that there is no way of life we can take as human that it will turn us into angels.
But Christianity is the only thing that will make anything close to it.
The idea is how close are we getting?
Christian re not always good peopel, but mor chirsitn are good people than people who have no God, and no faith. Or who have iath ina ahrshed God.
Not all charitiyes are chirsitn, but most of them are.
Not all world chagner have ben chirsitnst–but mst of the ones we still revere to this day were.
Not all really good books and sotreis are christiant, but many of the ones we still like after so many centureis were.
One has to look at the tendancies of man, not isioated indivuaile, sometiems.
While my dad was a jerk, and still is. I can’t being to guess how much worse it would have been if he did not at atle thav eto rpetend to be Christiatn. If it spared me one bad moment out of two, then it was something.
And he at least taught me to trun to God, even if he did not practice it himself the way I think he shoudl ahve.
My dad, while the most destructive force in my life next to my own human nature, also ushered in a lot of moments of truth for me.
Do I like him? No.
Can I ignore that? No.
God brings good out of bad, that’s what He does. He doesn’t just keep all bad away from us.
I find that view of life escapist.
I know that people often see this explanation as a christian cliche, and bitter, angry people do not want to hear it anyway.
But I’m to the point where I think: Well, sure, it’s cliche…but what else could you conclude based on the world around us?
God has to be good, I know, because if God was evil why would anything good still exist?
An Evil God would not bother giving us free will, would He?
You can’t reconcile the presence of Good and Evil in the world without a good God giving his creations free will, it’s just not possible.
If God was evil, we all literally wouldn’t have a prayer. If God didn’t care, then we would all be dead already from our own stupidly.
If God is Good, but does not force us to be, then we have our answer. Evil has consequences. To stop them is to render it meaningless to choose at all.
You can’t give your kids keys to the car, and then put it on autopilot, and say that they drove it. It’s just not how choice works. If they crash it, that was a a risk you took.
But it’s more of a risk to not let a kid learn how to do things for themselves, is it not? If you cannot coddle them through life, what will they do?
And God could do that for us, but he seems more interesting having adults, or at least kids with some sense of self.
Every child understands the idea of choice, it’s us older people who try to say we don’t have one.
It’s an old answer, but maybe let’s old because it’s true.
We should consider that, you know.
Some things are just true, so they are eternal.
I know that people who have been hurt do not want to hear that it had to happen.
And maybe it didn’t, I’m not sure sin ever “had” to happen.
But it does.
We all do it.
I’m inclined now, at 22, to think it’s a better use of my time to let God heal and teach me to live better, than to whine about how it all sucked.
Jesus suffered too, after all.
I still have lots of memories of self pity, but God willing, they are getting less.
And I do have some things I still need to work through, but I’m leaning also that it is not the most important thing in the world.
I guess, I’m saying, we can complain about our lives…or we can take the offer to have them made new.
But guess what, whether you take Gods’ offer or not, you’re life is still going to have bad things in it.
It’s just a matter or whether you ever want there to be more to it than that.
That has always been what Christianity offers. Not an escape from the world, but from yourself, and your pain.
With that thought, I think I’ll just end this here, this is short for me, but I think that’s okay.